Studies on titanised mesh implants
Benefits of titanisation
| Benefit | Studies |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility |
|
| Better cell growth |
|
| Lower risk of inflammation |
|
| Less scarring |
|
| Less shrinkage of mesh |
|
| Less foreign body sensation |
|
| Less postoperative pain |
|
| Shorter convalescence |
|
| Intraperitoneal application |
|
Mesh implant in pelvic floor surgery
| Title | Author | Source | Cases | Downloads | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction of a different immune response in non-titanized compared to titanized polypropylene meshes | Protsepko, Jeschke et al. | Acta Biomater. 2023,169:363-371 | 644 | Pubmed | |
| Self-Retaining-Support (SRS) Implant: an anchorless system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse – a 2-year follow-up | Levy et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2018, 29(5):709-714 | 20 | Pubmed | |
| Anchorless implant for the treatment of advanced anterior and apical vaginal prolapse – Medium term follow up | Levy et al. | Gynecol. Reprod. Biol 246 (2020) 55-59 | 70 | Pubmed | |
| Surgical treatment of advanced anterior wall and apical vaginal prolapse using the anchorless self-retaining support implant: long-term follow-up | Levy et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jan 13: 1–9 | 70 | Pubmed | |
| Cadaver study of anchorless implant for the treatment of anterior and apical vaginal wall prolapse | Cervigni et al. | European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 210 (2017) 173–176 | 2 | Pubmed | |
| Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients | Veit-Rubin et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2017, 28(11):1685-1693 | 417 | Pubmed | |
| Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique | Chatziioannidou et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):319-325 | 88 | Pubmed | |
| Uterus preservation is superior to hysterectomy when performing laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh | Veit-Rubin et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):557-564. | 339 | Pubmed | |
| Medium-term outcomes after robotic-assisted lateral suspension with mesh for advanced multi-compartmental prolapse | Russo et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Aug;31(8):1647-1653. | 115 | Pubmed | |
| Mini-Laparoscopic Repair of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) by Lateral Suspension with Mesh | Mereu et al. | Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):139-145. | 35 | Pubmed | |
| Laparoscopic lateral suspension, another way to treat genital prolapse | Dubuisson et al. | Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Jan;45(1):32-36. French. | Pubmed | ||
| Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients | Veit-Rubin et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Mar;27(3):491-3. | 245 | Pubmed | |
| Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes | Simoncini et al. | Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5647-5655. | 40 | Pubmed | |
| Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: Benefits of a Cross-shaped Mesh to Treat Difficult Vaginal Vault Prolapse | Dubuisson et al. | J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):672. | Pubmed | ||
| Robotically assisted laparoscopic repair of anterior vaginal wall and uterine prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: initial experience and video | Dällenbach et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Aug;25(8):1137-9. | 10 | Pubmed | |
| Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh | Dubuisson et al. | Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Feb;287(2):307-12. | 73 | Pubmed | |
| Treatment of genital prolapse by laparoscopic lateral suspension using mesh: a series of 73 patients | Dubuisson et al. | J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):49-55. | 73 | Pubmed | |
| Significant Improvement in Quality of Life, Positive Effect on Sexuality, Lasting Reconstructive Result and Low Rate of Complications Following Cystocele Correction Using a Lightweight, Large-Pore, Titanised Polypropylene Mesh: Final Results of a National, Multicentre Observational Study | Cadenbach-Blome et al. | Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Sep;79(9):959-968. | 54 | Pubmed | |
| Quality of Life, Sexuality, Anatomical Results and Side-effects of Implantation of an Alloplastic Mesh for Cystocele Correction at Follow-up after 36 Months | Fünfgeld et al. | Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Sep;77(9):993-1001. | 289 | Pubmed | |
| Improvement of pelvic floor-related quality of life and sexual function after vaginal mesh implantation for cystocele: primary endpoint of a prospective multicentre trial | Farthmann et al. | Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;294(1):115-21. | 289 | Pubmed | |
| A new titanium-covered transobturator tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence | Fahrni et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Apr;33(4):911-918. | 151 | Pubmed | |
| Titanized polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic sacral colpopexy | Campagna et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):763-768. | 217 | Pubmed | |
| Quality of life and pelvic organ prolapse-related symptoms after pelvic floor reconstruction with a titanized polypropylene mesh for cystocele: long-term results in a 36 month follow-up | Fünfgeld et al. | Pelviperineology, 2018. 37(4): p. 105-109. | |||
| The TiLOOP® Male Sling: Did We Forejudge? | Hüsch et al. | Urol Int, 2017. | 34 | Pubmed | |
| Titanized Transobturator Sling Placement for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Using an Inside-out Single-incision Technique: Minimum 12-Months Follow-up Study. | Sacco et al. | Urology, 2018. 115: p. 144-150. | 44 | Pubmed | |
| Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study. | Sacco et al. | BJU Int, 2021. 127(2): p. 229-237. | 109 | Pubmed | |
| Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse | Dällenbach et al. | J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):287-294 | 59 | Pubmed | |
| Minimal Invasive Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Lateral Suspension: A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Non-Inferiority Trial | Russo et al. | J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2926. | 300 | Pubmed | |
| Comparison of 2-year follow-up outcomes of laparoscopic lateral suspension and sacrospinous fixation in apical compartment prolapse | Erin et al. | Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Nov;298(5):939-944 | 105 | Pubmed | |
| Robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension: a step‑by‑step approach aiming to standardize a novel procedure | Lange et al. | Int Urogynecol J. 2023 May;34(5):1131-1134 | 1 | Pubmed |
Mesh implants in breast surgery
| Title | Author | Source | Cases | Downloads | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction of a different immune response in non-titanized compared to titanized polypropylene meshes | Protsepko, Jeschke et al. | Acta Biomater. 2023,169:363-371 | 644 | Pubmed | |
| Patient Quality of Life After Subpectoral Implantbased Breast Reconstruction With Synthetic or Biological Materials | Ohlinger et al. | ANTICANCER RESEARCH. 2021, 41(6): 3075-3082 | 121 | Pubmed | |
| Retrospective Study of Radiotherapy Impact on the Outcome of Material-assisted Implant-based Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction | Ohlinger et al. | ANTICANCER RESEARCH. 2021, 41(4): 2017-2024 | 281 | Pubmed | |
| TiLoop® Bra Assisted Breast Reconstruction – Our Experience | Krivorotko et al. | Chirurgia. 2021, 116(2): 84-90 | 103 | Pubmed | |
| Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh as innovative bioactive material in conservatives mastectomies and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction | Gentile et al. | Bioactive Materials. 2021, 6(12): 4640–4653 | 276 | Pubmed | |
| Patient reported outcome and cosmetic evaluation following implant-based breast-reconstruction with a titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP®Bra): A prospective clinical study in 269 patients | Thill et al. | European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2020, 46(8): 1484-1490 | 269 | Pubmed | |
| Prepectoral breast reconstruction with TiLoop® Bra Pocket: a single center prospective study | Lo Torto et al. | European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2020, 24: 991-999 | 18 | Pubmed | |
| Veritas in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Is Associated with Higher Complications Compared with TiLOOP | Quah et al. | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 2019, 7(12): e2533 | 150 | Pubmed | |
| A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients | Casella et al. | European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2019, 45(8): 1357-1363 | 397 | Pubmed | |
| Subcutaneous expanders and synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction: Long-term and patientreported BREAST-Q outcomes of a single- center prospective study | Casella et al. | Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2019, 72(5): 805–812 | 187 | Pubmed | |
| Renaissance der präpektoralen Implantateinlage. Alte Überlegungen – neue Materialien | Paepke et al. | gynäkologische praxis. 2019, 45(1): 111–120 | 1935 | med-search | |
| Current practice and barriers of mesh-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals | Guo et al. | European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2019, 46(1): 65-70 | Pubmed | ||
| Surgical outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction using TiLOOP® Bra mesh combined with pectoralis major disconnection | Chen et al. | Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2019, 83: 396-400 | 59 | Pubmed | |
| Surgical Studies of Reconstructive Breast Surgery – An Overview of the Topics at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Working Group for Reconstructive Surgery in Oncology-Gynecology | Paepke et al. | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2019, 79(06): 584-590 | Pubmed | ||
| Evaluation of prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with TiLOOP® Bra mesh for breast reconstruction: a prospective study on long-term and patient reported BREAST-Q outcomes | Casella et al. | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019, 143(1): 1e-9e | 179 | Pubmed | |
| Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLOOP® Bra mesh in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using BREAST-Q | Casella et al. | The Breast. 2018, 39: 8-13 | Pubmed | ||
| Pregnancy following Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Titanized Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra) without Compromising the Result. | Nolte et al. | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 2018, 6(9): e1919 | Pubmed | ||
| Risk-reducing, conservative mastectomy—analysis of surgical outcome and quality of life in 272 implantbased reconstructions using TiLOOP® Bra versus autologous corial flaps | Rezai et al. | Gland Surgery. 2016, 5(1): 1-8 | 217 | Pubmed | |
| Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial | Gschwantler-Kaulich et al. | European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 42(5): 665-671 | 48 | Pubmed | |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh – A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST‑Q and Overview of the Literature | Dieterich et al. | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2015, 75(7): 692-701 | 90 | Pubmed | |
| Subcutaneous Tissue Expander Placement with Synthetic Titanium-Coated Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Results | Casella et al. | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 2015, 3(12): e577 | 25 | Pubmed | |
| Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up | Bernini et al. | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 2015, 3(12): e574 | 63 | Pubmed | |
| Biocompatibility, cell growth and clinical relevance of synthetic meshes and biological matrixes for internal support in implant-based breast reconstruction | Dietrich et al. | Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014, 291(6): 1371-1379 | Pubmed | ||
| TiLOOP® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series. | Casella et al. | European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2014, 37(11): 599-604 | 63 | Pubmed | |
| Biological Matrizes and Synthetic Meshes used in implant based breast reconstruction - a Review of products available in Germany | Dieterich et al. | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2013, 73(11): 1100-1106 | Pubmed | ||
| Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP®Bra): A Multicenter Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Multicenter Study of 231 Cases | Dieterich et al. | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal. 2013, 132(1): 8e-19e | 231 | Pubmed | |
| A short-term follow-up of implant based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra). | Dieterich et al. | European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012, 38(12): 1225-1230 | 42 | Pubmed | |
| Using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra) for implant-based breast reconstruction: case report and histological analysis. | Dieterich et al. | Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012, 286(1): 273-276 | Springer | ||
| Impact of the TiLOOP® Bra mesh in CT images and dose delivery in breast radiotherapy | Camacho et al. | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2012, 13(2): 3667 | Pubmed |
Mesh implants in visceral surgery
| Title | Author | Source | Cases | Downloads | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction of a different immune response in non-titanized compared to titanized polypropylene meshes | Protsepko, Jeschke et al. | Acta Biomater. 2023,169:363-371 | 644 | Pubmed | |
| Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9,907 patients | Köckerling et al. | Surgical Endoscopy volume 33, 2019. pages3361–3369 | 9907 | ||
| Titanium-Coated Mesh Versus Standard Polypropylene Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial | Yang et al. | Hernia, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1823-z. | 50 | ||
| Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Large Hiatus Hernia Repair with Nonabsorbable Mesh | Gordon et al. | Dis Esophagus., 2018. 31(5): p. 1-6. | 50 | ||
| The Importance of Registries in the Postmarketing Surveillance of Surgical Meshes | Köckerling et al. | Ann Surg., 2017. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002326. | 201 | ||
| Endoscopic-Assisted Linea Alba Reconstruction - New Technique for Treatment of Symptomatic Umbilical, Trocar, and/or Epigastric Hernias with Concomitant Rectus Abdominis Diastasis | Köckerling et al. | Eur Surg., 2017. 49(2): p. 71-75. | 140 | ||
| Adhesion Prevention in Ventral Hernia Repair: An Experimental Study Comparing Three Lightweight Porous Meshes Recommended for Intraperitoneal Use | D’Amore et al. | Hernia, 2017. 21(1): p. 115-123. | |||
| The Influence of Titanium Coating of Mesh Polypropylene Endoprostheses on Their Biocompatibility | Babichenko et al. | Cell and Tissue Biology, 2016. 10(4): p. 332-339. | |||
| Which Should Be the Gold Standard Laparoscopic Technique for Handling Spigelian Hernias? | Moreno-Egea et al. | Surg Endosc., 2015. 29(4): p. 856-862. | 7 | ||
| Is It Possible to Eliminate Sutures in Open (Lichtenstein Technique) and Laparoscopic (Totally Extraperitoneal Endoscopic) Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Randomized Controlled Trial with Tissue Adhesive (n-Hexyl-α-Cyanoacrylate) | Moreno-Egea | Surg Innov., 2014. 21(6): p. 590-599. | 208 | ||
| What Do We Know About Titanized Polypropylene Meshes? An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature | Köckerling et al. | Hernia, 2014. 18(4): p. 445-57. | |||
| Guidelines for Laparoscopic Treatment of Ventral and Incisional Abdominal Wall Hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS]) – Part III | Bittner et al. | Surg Endosc., 2014. 28: p. 380-404. | |||
| Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Comparing Titanium-Coated Lightweight Mesh and Medium-Weight Composite Mesh | Moreno-Egea et al. | Surg Endosc., 2013. 27 (1): p. 231-239. | |||
| The Impact of Atraumatic Fibrin Sealant vs. Staple Mesh Fixation in TAPP Hernia Repair on Chronic Pain and Quality of Life: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study | Fortelny et al. | Surg Endosc., 2012. 26(1): 249-54. | 89 | ||
| Chronic Pain after Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Comparison of Light and Extralight Titanized Polypropylene Mesh | Schopf et al. | World J Surg., 2011. 35(2): p. 302-310. | 380 | ||
| Hiatoplasty Reinforcement by Means of a Lightweight Titanized Polypropylene Mesh Fixed with Fibrin Glue | Kanellos et al. | Zentralbl Chir., 2011. 136(3): p. 244-248. | 26 | ||
| The Feasibility of FS Mesh Fixation by a Transgastric Approach – An Important Benefit in Future NOTES Procedures? | Fortelny et al. | J Surg.Res, 2011. 171(1): p. 80-86. | |||
| Early Postoperative and One Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of Extralight Titanized Polypropylene Mesh and Traditional Heavyweight Polypropylene Mesh on Pain and Seroma Production in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair (TAPP) | Bittner et al. | World J Surg., 2011. 35(8): p. 1791–1797. | 150 | ||
| Fibrin Sealant (Tisseel) for Hiatal Mesh Fixation in an Experimental Model in Pigs | Fortelny et al. | J Surg.Res, 2010. 162(1): p. 68-74. | |||
| Randomized Clinical Trial of Groin Hernia Repair with Titanium-Coated Lightweight Mesh Compared with Standard Polypropylene Mesh | Koch et al. | Br. J. Surg., 2008. 95(10): p. 1226-1231. | 156 | ||
| Evaluation of Lightweight Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiMESH) for Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias | Hazebroek et al. | Surg Endosc., 2008. 22(11): p. 2428-2432. | 18 | ||
| The Assessment of Quality of Life in a Trial on Lightweight Mesh Fixation with Fibrin Sealant in Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair | Fortelny et al. | Hernia, 2008. 12(5): p. 499-505. | 11 | ||
| A Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh (TiMESH) For Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias: Comparison of Biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an Experimental Study Using the Porcine Model | Schug-Paß et al. | Surg. Endosc., 2006. 20(3): p. 402-409. | |||
| Impact of Polypropylene Amount on Functional Outcome and Quality of Life after Inguinal Hernia Repair by the TAPP procedure Using Pure, Mixed, and Titanium-coated Meshes | Horstmann et al. | World J Surg., 2006. 30(9): p. 1742-1749. | 223 | ||
| Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernioplasty with Titanium-Coated Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh: Early Results. | Tamme et al. | Surg Endosc., 2005. 19(8): p. 1125-1129. | 400 | ||
| Influence of Titanium Coating on the Biocompatibility of a Heavyweight Polypropylene Mesh | Scheidbach et al. | Eur Surg. Res., 2004. 36(5): p. 313-317. | |||
| In Vivo Studies Comparing the Biocompatibility of Various Polypropylene Meshes and Their Handling Properties During Endoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Patchplasty: An Experimental Study in Pigs | Scheidbach et al. | Surg Endosc., 2004. 18(2): p. 211-220. |
Titanised mesh implants
- For hernia surgery
- For reconstructive and aesthetic breastsurgery